Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice"
Results 361 - 380
of 700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
Justice David Souter, writing the majority opinion for the United States Supreme Court, upheld Exxon's liability for the incident, but found the $2.5 billion excessive. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Department of Defense, which asks whether challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s definition of the “waters of the United States” must be brought in federal district court or in a federal court of appeals, observing that the “Supreme Court has likely stepped in to resolve this dispute because it is a waste of judicial resources for federal courts of appeals to decide whether WOTUS regulations are lawful if they don’t have the… [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
Both the majority and the dissent in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
On June 25, the Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated holding in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Justice Stevens accepted the validity of these state interests as unquestionably legitimate. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
Justice Souter filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Stevens and Ginsburg. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 8:05 am
Under Brady v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
As Justice Stevens remarked to Mr. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
” See Justice Stevens’ opinion in Hamdan v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 6:05 am
Litigation in the case, Thompson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 10:31 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens, the author of the main opinion in Pacifica, is the only member of the Court still serving. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:17 pm
The other case, United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:51 am
The other case, United States v. [read post]
