Search for: "Sullivan v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2013, 12:07 pm
Department of Justice & Ex Officio Member United States Sentencing Commission Program Description On August 12, 2013, Attorney General Holder released a memorandum entitled “Department Policy on Charging Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Recidivist Enhancements in Drug Cases. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Reasons for dismissing the appeal: Maurice Kay LJ and Sullivan LJ agreed with Laws LJ in dismissing the appeal. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
But “[t]he Senators and Representatives . . . , and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support [the] Constitution. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 12:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:19 am
The Court of Appeals finds the plaintiffs have stated a claim that allows them to proceed to discovery.The case is Florence v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 6:05 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:41 pm
Techs., Inc., 348 F.3d 1163, 1168-69 (10th Cir.2003); United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
In the Court of Appeal Moses LJ, with whom Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony MR and Sullivan LJ agreed, concluded that the discrimination was indirect rather than direct. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Arzan Tarapore explained how India can help the United States check China’s rise in region. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:22 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: It’s Not Rocket Science, But It’s Still a Matter of Agency Expertise
27 Mar 2022, 7:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
In proceedings in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 1:59 pm
On 19 January, CAAF granted review in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:09 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:34 am
Back in May, Col Sullivan reported: NMCCA heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Given the current climate, hate speech prosecutions will probably become more common in the United States soon. [read post]
