Search for: "THOMAS v. US GOVERNMENT"
Results 361 - 380
of 5,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
Abbott, holding that states and local governments may use total population to draw legislative districts. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:58 am
Finally, relying on Matal v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm
Kelley, 482 F.3d 1047. 1055 (9th Cir. 2007) (Thomas, J., dissenting); United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
On July 9, the Supreme Court decided Trump v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:21 am
The government's position is that when the railroad use ended, the easement reverted back to the government, which could then convert those rights-of-way to trails under the "rails-to-trails" program. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
The use of defamation as a means of policing false statements, even in the area of political speech (see g., Dominion Voting Systems v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:58 am
Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
"GET OVER IT”Justice Scalia used to hammer audiences with this command when asked about Bush v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:57 am
These sorts of physical appropriations constitute the 'clearest sort of taking,' and we assess them using a simple, per se rule: The government must pay for what it takes. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:10 am
That last case — Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:53 pm
T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:08 am
Qualcomm and Oracle v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:13 pm
(Ilya Somin) Newt Gingrich recently claimed that Founding Fathers George Washington and Thomas Jefferson “would have rather strongly discouraged you from growing marijuana and their techniques with dealing with it would have been rather more violent than our current government. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:11 am
Sabri v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:19 am
I’ll close this post with Justice Thomas’s observation in IRAP v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:10 am
Joining [Pennsylvania state officials], the United States [government], as it has done in five other cases in the last decade, again asks us to overrule Roe. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
US Supreme Court holds it has jurisdiction to review decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces of the United StatesOrtiz v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
When the government uses a racial classification, the courts will apply the "strict scrutiny" test to determine whether that use is consistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
