Search for: "Taylor v. State Bar"
Results 361 - 380
of 626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:05 am
The doctrine bars civil lawsuits against government officials, including state and local police, when they violate someone’s constitutional rights-- unless their actions violated a “clearly established” constitutional or statutory right. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
The court initially considers if the subject of the claim sought to be arbitrated is the type authorized by Civil Service Law Article 14 [the Taylor Law] and is not barred by constitutional, statutory or public policy considerations, the first test. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
In some instances a public employer has negotiated a "no outside employment" provision in the course of collective bargaining under the Taylor Law that provides that approval of outside employment is at the sole discretion of the appointing authority.However, other provisions of law may bar moonlighting involving certain employers.For example, an article in the August 25, 2010 issue of the Buffalo News reported: “Police officers cannot work in a licensed… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
’ The CJEU did agree and has agreed ever since.Yet, the impact of CJEU case law, even after more and consistent CJEU case law tackling the concept of originality, has not always been understood correctly by UK courts, with some judgments suggesting that ‘author’s own intellectual creation’ is an alternative phrase for ‘sufficient skill, labour or effort’ (Temple Island, para 27; Taylor v Maguire, para 8).More recent judgments support however the… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
The negotiated agreement, however, mandated that the PCTEA member highest on the list, and otherwise reachable for appointment, be selected for the appointment.Since Section 61 of the Civil Service Law permits the selection of one of the top three candidates from the eligible list, the award does not automatically bar members of Local 264 from promotional positions for which a member of PCTEA might be considered because a PCTEA member may not be one of the top three candidates.The… [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:45 am
The very next day, the Court decided 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Lee, No. 06-3438 A sentence for various counts of bank fraud and aggravated identity theft is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in running several of the aggravated identity theft counts consecutively to each other; and 2) all of defendant's other issues on appeal were barred by his plea agreement or outside the scope of a remand order, and thus were barred. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
This fall term, the United States Supreme Court will hear Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:56 am
--Beth Taylor [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
Drown (07-10374), the Court will decide whether it is unconstitutional for a state to bar all private damages claims in state court against state prison employees, including claims under federal civil rights law. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
” As applied to older technologies, the rule contemplates that a tracking device may be a mechanical tool used to track the movement of a tangible object., like the beeper attached to a container of chloroform in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The same regulatory facts supported a preemption holding barring a Motrin-related claim in Robinson v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:14 am
The court case is Thomas Hansen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:41 am
Fed. ...See all stories on this topic STATE v. [read post]
