Search for: "Testing Holdings USA, Inc."
Results 361 - 380
of 516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
Martha Elizabeth, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
USA, Inc., 518 F.3d 1353, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
USA, Inc., 518 F.3d 1353, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 2007 WL 5787186 (S.D. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
Chevron USA, Inc., 544 U.S. 528, 537 (2005) (quoting Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:42 am
In re PRL USA Holdings, Inc., Serial No. 77634450 (March 21, 2011) [not precedential].The Examining Attorney contended that the goods "have similar uses" and are marketed in the same trade channels. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:35 pm
ConnectU (08-16873) and USA v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:29 am
Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., 621 F.3d 1162, 1176 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., ___ F. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 522 F.3d 1299, 1307 (Fed. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
March 24 (Bloomberg) — Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed a motion for authority to carry out its end of an agreement for the bankruptcy reorganization of Innkeepers USA Trust, a real estate investment trust that owns 72 extended-stay hotels. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm
Tuesday, the Supreme Court holds a one-hour oral argument on the biggest class-action lawsuit in decades, involving the job policies of the huge discount retailer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
However, the Van Breda test does not fit well with internet-based libel actions. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Hy-Grade Valve, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Lack of intent to deceive warrants summary judgment of no false marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
Allergan USA, Inc., 2009 WL 3294873, at *2-5 (D. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
Teleflex Inc., the Federal Circuit has erred in applying a “lead compound test” as the exclusive standard for determining whether a patent claim directed to a new chemical compound is “obvious” and therefore invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006) (holding that in antitrust tying cases, courts should not presume that a patent confers market power). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm
[5] Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:02 pm
Jackson, et al., 10-735), and a Seventeenth Amendment case testing whether a state is obliged always to hold a new election any time a U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Mayne Pharma (USA) Inc., 467 F.3d 1370, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
