Search for: "The People v. Dukes"
Results 361 - 380
of 788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:26 am
– Pugh v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:09 am
A number of people testified against Mr. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
Dukes, has already allowed companies to defeat or devalue tons of employment discrimination class actions. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:14 am
Globally, governments murdered well over 200 million people. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:05 pm
But the Texas statute, and the rationales set forth in English and Duke, are outliers. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Rikos v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am
But they conveniently forget that America, after a less than promising start marred by the likes of Dred Scott v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
Dukes Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:52 am
So here, these people were doing just that. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
[xxiv] More than 11,000 people contributed over $150 million to the organization. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
Can help us think about a number of cases: Duke Nukem in 3D/MicroStar v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
See Texas v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 3:03 pm
From Weller v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 9:05 am
However, given what happened in the Duke Lacrosse case, one wonders whether it is wise to continue to allow this uneven playing field to exist at the initial stages of a criminal case. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:06 pm
Dukes decision's recent reformulation of the "common issue" requirement). [read post]
22 May 2007, 4:16 am
Judicial instinct vs. the quiet objection I was already thinking about judges' instinctive responses to juror bias issues because of People v. [read post]
