Search for: "Thomas v. Stevens" Results 361 - 380 of 2,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
Many court-watchers thought that the justices might settle the issue of partisan gerrymandering once and for all, or at the very least provide more guidance, last term, in Gill v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Thomas, No. 2016-CV-2155 (C.P. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am by Lindsay See
As early as 1980, for instance, Justice John Paul Stevens called attempts to reconcile the decisions stemming from Lemon as a “Sisyphean task. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As the Supreme Court explained in the 1852 case of Moore v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am by Adam Feldman
One explanation by Professors James Spriggs and Thomas Hansford is ideological. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am by Schachtman
The published case report by Ratner helps demonstrate that Allen v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm by Victoria Kwan
Without independence, there is no Brown v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm by Mark Walsh
Ginni Thomas, the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, has taken her seat in the guest box. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm by John Dean
The six justices with executive experience remained solid conservatives (Burger, Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito); while the six without such backgrounds became moderates and even liberal (Blackmun, Powell, Stevens, O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter). [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
Those decisions—including one by then-Judge Clarence Thomas—were by judges who are as skeptical of antitrust as Judge Kavanaugh does, and they grossly exaggerated the actual holdings and language of the Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Legal Studies Paper (2018)).Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, Revisiting Abdul Kadir v Salima: Locus Classicus on Civil Nature of Marriage? [read post]