Search for: "U. S. v. Certain"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,677
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
Thys Co., 379 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:08 pm
Cargill, 602 U. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
Warshaw Burstein, LLP v Colambda Tech., Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 34435(U) December 14, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 150283/2023Judge: Louis L. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am
Breyer and Alito pursued at some length a related textual question, noting that certain nonimmigrant victims of crime are eligible to remain in the United States on “U visas. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 11:04 am
Must you show that each plaintiff's claim is less than a certain amount? [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
Demand for premium pay where union cannot negotiate a disciplinary procedure a mandatory subject of collective bargainingMatter of City of New York v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, 2008 NY Slip Op 52693(U), Decided on January 18, 2008, Supreme Court, Albany County, Judge Henry F. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
In Foster v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
In Foster v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 12:49 pm
In a complicated and convoluted March 15, 2024 decision, Pulsifer v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:09 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
L. 107–347, §208(b), is one mechanism for ensuring, at least in certain contexts, that the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:54 pm
Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm
The case, Ruan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Matin v Chowdhury 2020 NY Slip Op 32491(U) June 18, 2020 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 701633/2019 Judge: Joseph Risi is the story of possible dual representation in the purchase of a franchise. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Sierra Club, 592 U. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 4:05 pm
Harris as decided by the U. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
Supreme Court granted the City's motion to dismiss the Chief's petition, agreeing with the City that the Chief's Article 78 action was moot. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
Supreme Court granted the City's motion to dismiss the Chief's petition, agreeing with the City that the Chief's Article 78 action was moot. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:38 am
Massachusetts, 197 U. [read post]
