Search for: "U. S. v. King"
Results 361 - 380
of 570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2013, 6:15 am
The U. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action against the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), the vehicle's titled owner and lessor, the vehicle's driver, and the vehicle's registered owner, American Transit, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Rennert v S.M.R. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
U. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Subramanian, 2009 NY Slip Op 52188(U) (Sup Ct Kings County Oct. 26, 2009), decided by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
” U. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:57 pm
A pleading that simply avers the substantive elements of inequitable conduct, without setting forth the particularized factual bases for the allegation, does not satisfy Rule 9(b).3 See King Auto., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
S. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
Kings 2016); C.G. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
King Construction Co. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am
“Grammatical Irregularities” Don’t Govern Operating Agreement’s Capital Call Provision Chen v 697 Dekalb LLC, 2022 NY Slip Op 32418(U) [Sup Ct Kings County July 18, 2022]. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 8:54 am
The complaint lists the following retail outlets as defendants: LA View, VIP Connection, Stand Out, Plush AKA Club Unisex Clothing, Players 96, Buba Fashion, Diva Fashion, Mufy Fashion, Guvi Outlet, Lizz's Closet, Styles 4 U, Allure Clothing, King of Music and Fashion, Allure Clothing, and Attitude. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am
The Eikenberry Case A recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Eikenberry v Lamson, 2020 NY Slip Op 33992(U) [Kings County Nov. 30, 2020], is a fine springboard for exploring the application of these legal standards to business divorce litigation where (as is often the case) the injunction movant’s ownership status in the business is hotly contested. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
Caldwell v Gutman, Mintz, Baker Sonnfeldt, P.C. ; 2011 NY Slip Op 52116(U) ; Decided on November 25, 2011 ; Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County ; Levine, J. give a full history of the conflict. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
U. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
The Roots of Sexual Privacy: Warren and Brandeis & the Privacy of Intimate Life 42 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 383 (2019), U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2019-06, Danielle Keats Citron, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Tarick Loufti v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
