Search for: "U. S. v. Stephen"
Results 361 - 380
of 445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
True to recent practice, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, concurred in the Williams GVR, remarking that a Louisiana procedural rule – permitting a trial court, rather than a prosecutor, to supply a race-neutral reason for striking a potential juror at Batson’s second step – conflicted with the Court’s jurisprudence. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
(citing and quoting Soldo v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Jon's article follows. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The judgment of McCallum J staying Craig McLachlan’s defamation case until the final determination of the criminal proceedings commenced in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria is available at McLachlan v Browne (No 9) [2019] NSWSC 10. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
There was a post on the IPSO’s website. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:07 am
JC 578 R383 U24 1977 U? [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am
If he does, should the committee’s legislative purpose be scrutinized under the exacting criteria established by the Supreme Court in the 2020 Trump v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:52 pm
” In a lengthy dissent on behalf of herself and Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer, Justice Sonia Sotomayor took issue with each step of the majority’s analysis. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Louis U. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 10:43 am
Sob o pseudônimo de Stephen G. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Yet, if courts follow the logic that underlies the Supreme Court’s decision in Opitz v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
" Furman, 408 U. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:57 pm
Nunnemaker, 501 U. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:14 am
“Sovereignty,” he wrote in a magazine article (attacking Stephen Douglas for being soft on States Rights!) [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
In a concurring opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, agreed with the outcome but attempted to cabin the decision’s reach and justify it on narrower grounds. [read post]
