Search for: "U.S. v. Mark R"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
Benedict v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:03 am
The policy regarding surveillance of marijuana grow operations in open or public fields has been governed by the decision in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:38 am
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992) (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:34 am
The book came out before the Supreme Court’s ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 7:29 am
” Lexmark, 572 U.S. at 130 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:23 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in J.D.B. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:26 pm
R-E-S-P-E-C-T. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
R. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
This post was written by Mark S. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 12:47 pm
Mark Eugene Duxbury v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
Koller, 472 U.S. 424, 430–31(1985) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); seealso Cohen v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:38 am
V EBAY INC. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 81 (1980).) [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
” See Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 5:16 am
A Manhattan federal district court did not err in dismissing a Thai resident’s declaratory judgment action seeking cancellation of U.S. trademark registrations for the mark SULKA for failure to allege a genuine case or controversy sufficient to invoke federal subject matter jurisdiction, U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:53 am
Mark Barry, the PTAB confirmed the patentability of some of Barry’s patented back-straightening claims found in U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
As Mark J. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
It ruled that Dial-A-Mattress could establish secondary meaning in connection with its application for the mark 1-888-M-A-T-R-E-S-S, based upon the acquired distinctiveness of its legally equivalent mark (212) M-A-T-T-R-E-S (shown above). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:53 am
Mon Ros Int’l. for General Trading & Contracting, W.L.L. v. [read post]
