Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES" Results 361 - 380 of 3,026
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2021, 1:47 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In February 2020, before the rule went into effect, a group of state attorneys general filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York, seeking to invalidate the rule. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 12:03 pm by Mark Carter
Although the Montana Supreme Court has ruled that the state has a responsibility to implement the IEFA, the Montana Office of Public Instruction and the Montana Board of Public Education have failed to create uniform standards for implementing, monitoring, and enforcing Indian education as required by law. [read post]
  The court ruled that Trader Joe’s followed federal testing and retention protocols imposed by the federal Poultry Products Inspection Act before declaring that its chicken contains up to 5% retained water. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 10:09 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, which reversed a federal district court’s order denying a motion to compel under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the Cato Institute could not have the court hear its claim that court-ordered settlements with the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
She also wants the FEC to set a uniform time frame for when candidates may begin drawing compensation. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am by Rachel E. VanLandingham
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 8:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Although Arnold denies treating Oliver differently than other students and maintains that he enforced his classroom rules evenly, the district court again found that these facts are genuinely disputed, and we thus must assume that Arnold singled Oliver out for hostile mistreatment as a result of her opposition to the Pledge assignment…. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Given this, it might make good sense to read “becomes effective by June 30” in light of the separate requirement in the Illinois Constitution (entitled “Effective Dates of Laws”) that the General Assembly “provide by law for a uniform effective date for laws passed prior to June 1 of a calendar year,” but permitting the legislature to adopt variations from the uniform requirement in particular laws passed before June 1. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Zachary Fasman
” Writing only for himself, he stressed the significance of the Court’s holding that the normal rule of reason analysis applied to NCAA rules limiting the compensation of student-athletes. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 4:11 pm by Patricia Salkin
Moreover, the requirement that regulations must be uniform for each class or kind of building in a district does not apply when the City imposes different design requirements, depending on the structure or area under its delegation of power. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 5:32 am by Samuel Bray
Again we see district courts giving national injunctions that rely on circuit precedent. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:32 am by Peter Mahler
The Supreme Court’s ruling last month handed victory to the Clarks, reversing the lower court’s orders granting dissolution and recategorizing capital contributions as debt. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Maryland has a uniform speed limit of 30 mph in business districts, residential areas, and school zones. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:18 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
The law firm refused, citing attorney-client privilege, but the district court overruled the law firm’s privilege objection and the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:28 am by Michel Paradis
” Removing the chain of command from the court-martial process will be the most fundamental reform of the military justice system since the passage of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) in 1950, and some critics remain stalwart. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:00 am by Scarlet Kim
District Court for the District of Columbia struck down portions of the Trump policy, ruling that the Immigration and Nationality Act “contains no minimum service requirement. [read post]