Search for: "United States District Court Clerk"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,382
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2021, 4:30 am
Most of the Justices and even the lawyers arguing against SB-8 for the clinics and the United States seemed to assume that injunctions in this case against Texas judges would be inappropriate so they focused on enjoining Texas' clerks from filing SB-8 cases. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Say the providers win before the Supreme Court and again before the district court on remand, getting their injunction against the clerks. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Say the providers win before the Supreme Court and again before the district court on remand, getting their injunction against the clerks. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 8:55 am
District Court Judge, Judicial District Court, Navajo Nation Wide. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:47 am
He served as a law clerk for Judge Walter Stapleton on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 1996 to 1997. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:06 am
Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 22 provides: A civil suit in the district or county court shall be commenced by a petition filed in the office of the clerk. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:15 am
Whether private parties can sue court clerks, or whether the U.S. can sue a state to enjoin a law its executive doesn't enforce, are yes-or-no questions: either they can or they can't. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois—must the United States now sue itself? [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:06 am
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Wasserman The Supreme Court hears arguments Monday in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
"The irony of all this, of course, is that without his Yale law degree (or one from a handful of other schools), Justice Thomas would be in no position to attack affirmative action from such a lofty place as the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 4:37 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 9:56 am
District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm
On April 13, 2015, defendant prepared a purported application to appear pro hac vice in United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The Chilling Effect of S.B. 8As a teacher and scholar of federal jurisdiction, I have taken an interest in the procedural issues raised by the litigation over S.B. 8, including in a brief urging the Court to allow the district court injunction against the law to go into effect and another one to be filed today that urges the Court to side with the United States and against Texas. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The Chilling Effect of S.B. 8As a teacher and scholar of federal jurisdiction, I have taken an interest in the procedural issues raised by the litigation over S.B. 8, including in a brief urging the Court to allow the district court injunction against the law to go into effect and another one to be filed today that urges the Court to side with the United States and against Texas. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 7:41 am
As the financial strain grew more and more dire, attorneys across the United States rose to the challenge to meet this unprecedented need. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
As the Brennan Center has noted, state critical infrastructure laws borrow from the federal concept of critical infrastructure: segments of the economy “so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect” on national security and public safety, thereby deserving enhanced legislative protection. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
The order directs the parties to address their arguments to the procedural issues in the case: "May the United States bring suit in federal court and obtain injunctive or declaratory relief against the State, state court judges, state court clerks, other state officials, or all private parties to prohibit S.B. 8 from being enforced? [read post]
