Search for: "United States of America v. In the Matter of the Application of the United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
See, e.g., LaMorte Burns & Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
See, e.g., LaMorte Burns & Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
This question was left unanswered for a very long time, until the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) resolved it in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:01 pm
Serbia chose to avoid the trap of pan-Slavism and voted with Europe (where its heart is may be a different matter but one worth noting). [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and… [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:10 pm
See Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
The defendants contend that Madden's claims fail as a matter of law for two reasons: (1) state-law usury claims and FDCPA claims predicated on state-law violations against a national bank's assignees, such as the defendants here, are preempted by the National Bank Act ("NBA"), and (2) the agreement governing Madden's debt requires the application of Delaware law, under which the interest charged is permissible.The District Court… [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
The defendants contend that Madden's claims fail as a matter of law for two reasons: (1) state-law usury claims and FDCPA claims predicated on state-law violations against a national bank's assignees, such as the defendants here, are preempted by the National Bank Act ("NBA"), and (2) the agreement governing Madden's debt requires the application of Delaware law, under which the interest charged is permissible.The District Court… [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Bank of the United States (1824) and Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833). [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 5:24 am
The bill would also restore the United States to a first-to-invent system, as we had before the U.S. changed to a first-to-file system at the Patent Office in a compromise to effectively harmonize our patent laws with those in most other countries around the world. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:16 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am
The Board seemingly took another troubling step in this direction in a subsequent decision— FreemantleMedia North America Inc. v Wright Alternative Advertising Inc. (2009 77 C.P.R. (4th) 311). [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:39 pm
America Co., 869 F.3d 1336, 1352 (Fed. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Although the Republican governor of Texas ordered his own state guard to “monitor” the U.S. military while it is in his state (which is, of course, still one of the fifty united states that our armed forces protect), and even though the reliably unhinged Rep. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
Meanwhile, Russia’s anger has also been roused by the United States’s activation of a missile defense site in Romania. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:42 am
” The case is Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 1:57 pm
Garland and Firebaugh v. [read post]
