Search for: "United States v. Alexander Grant" Results 361 - 380 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
One such so-called maxim originated with Justice Stone's "Footnote Four" in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am by Gerard Magliocca
Const., art I, § 3, cl. 1 (“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State . . . [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm by Sasha Volokh
See Alexander Volokh, The New Private-Regulation Skepticism: Due Process, Non-Delegation, and Antitrust Challenges, 37 HARV. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Kathy Hanley: Congress needs to keep more money in the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
 However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
Once granted, the import restriction lasts for five years, with the possibility of indefinite extension. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:16 am
Yet still, Commander in Chief Bush pronounced Ray and Larry enemies of the United States (as the CINC ordered) and then ordered subordinate command racketeers to inflict terrible violence upon these men (as with so many others) making Ray and Larry, their families, friends, and communities suffer in liberty and life.There were NO JUDGES, NO JURIES! [read post]