Search for: "United States v. Bare"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
Vinson, 477 US 57 (1986), in Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, Kathryn M. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution and, thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
" "None of [the] decisions [in the NYT v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:55 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
United States, 346 F.2d 52, 54 (5th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 976 (1966). 615 F. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 7:08 am
In CFPB v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Yesterday's Opinion by Justice Souter for the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:04 pm
The Court held that the funds paid were not the property of the debtor prior to payment; instead, they were held in trust by the debtor for the IRS; and concluded that the trustee may not recover the funds.In the letter, the MFA also said that it agrees with the FDIC’s determination not to include amounts owed to government-sponsored entities within the class of priority claims for amounts due to the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
In effect, the federal standards set the bare minimum. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:11 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 7:15 am
Cyr and Boumediene v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:59 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:41 pm
These statutes may provide authority that overlaps the inherent authority of the President to conduct foreign relations of the United States under Article II of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am
My family, like many others, was poor, barely scraping by. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm
United States, 284 U.S. 390 (1932)) is mistaken. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:07 am
That case is Matal v. [read post]
