Search for: "United States v. Grant, III" Results 361 - 380 of 2,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2022, 6:07 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The leading case on the effect of successive and mutually inconsistent planning permissions granted for development on the same site is Pilkington v Secretary of State for the Environment [1973] 1 WLR 1527. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm by Steve Vladeck
It’s not just Quirin that makes this position clear; it’s also Dynes v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm by Beth Graham
Part III gives a brief historical background on investment treaties and investor-state-dispute-settlement (ISDS). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
I suspect Supreme Court review is a serious possibility.The new decision holds that the plaintiffs have established Article III standing to challenge Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which creates new procedures for authorizing government electronic surveillance targeting non-United States persons outside the United States for purposes of collecting foreign intelligence. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:05 am by William S. Dodge
Some states do extend immunity to separate entities that exercise sovereign authority or sovereign power: Japan (art. 2(iii)), Pakistan (art. 15(2)), Singapore (art. 16(2)), South Africa (art. 15(1)), and the United Kingdom (art. 14(2)). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:22 pm by Viking
The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
The order’s focus faces outward towards the alien residents of the subject countries, not inward towards persons in the United States like the plaintiffs . . . . [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, for example, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v United States, 491 U.S. 617, 623 n. 3, 109 S Ct 2646, 105 L. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am by Adam Klein
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:55 am by David Klein
On December 5, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided the matter of Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The article begins with a quote from United States Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren E. [read post]