Search for: "United States v. Haire"
Results 361 - 380
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Holt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
And in Holt, it was the Arkansas Department of Correction’s facial hair policy rather than a state statute that led to the conflict. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:37 am
G & K appealed, and a panel of judges on the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals recently revisited the term “humiliation” in the context of the Auto-Owners policy. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am
Whereas his previous work did an admi- rable job of depicting how the historical trans- formation of ownership in the United States was aided by the process of measuring and recording, he has expanded his range here into a somewhat unmanageable though always interesting tract. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Klayman tells the panel that he doesn’t trust the United States’ explanation for his clie [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
United States The Boston Herald has dropped its appeal and agreed to pay US$903,000 to end a libel case arising out of a 2009 story alleging that Joanna Marinova had enaged in sexual acts with a “killer con” Research and Resources “Privacy, Democracy and Freedom of Expression”, Annabelle Lever, University of Geneva, SSRN Next week in the courts We are only aware of one application this week, in the case of Prince Alwaleed v Forbes Magazine on 5… [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
* Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
See Bowen v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
" I had heard about the sobering statistic that 49% of sources cited by the United States Supreme Court no longer link to the original content or page.But the concept of "reference rot" made my hair stand on end... the implications for academic scholarship are significant, but the implications for law firms could be devastating. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 9:35 am
In support of that assertion, the State cites United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
Amy Gonzalez v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:37 am
Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:17 am
Indeed, we have previously recognized that administrative searches are not rendered invalid because they are accompanied by some degree of suspicion, see Bruce, 498 F.3d at 1242, and the Supreme Court has similarly noted that suspicion of criminal activity will not defeat an otherwise permissible administrative search, see United States v. [read post]
