Search for: "United States v. Sotomayor" Results 361 - 380 of 3,478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2022, 8:00 am by Amy Howe
United States, a case involving citizenship for people who are born in the U.S. territory of American Samoa. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:09 am by John Jascob
They also argued that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction because Kwon and Terraform had insufficient contacts with the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
Castro-Huerta, which was joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. 142 S.Ct. 2486, 2506-07 (2022). [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm by Eric W. Orts
The first instance of the Court’s misfiring came in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, and the retired justice remains stone-faced with each one. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 11:47 am by Amy Howe
” The CWA defines “navigable waters” as “the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas”; swamps, bogs, and marshes can all be regarded as “wetlands. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1614, 1618 (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:05 am by jonathanturley
Last week, I had the honor of addressing the judges and staff of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 4:28 am by jonathanturley
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky celebrated that “Justice Sotomayor wrote a dissent, in which she said, ‘Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 11:38 am by Josh Blackman
To take a more recent example, Steve Vladeck, a chronic critic of the shadow docket, filed an amicus brief in one of the many United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:21 am by becassidy
This comes on the heels of the case decided by the Court in May of this year: United States v. [read post]