Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co."
Results 361 - 380
of 464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 11:57 am
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:36 am
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:23 am
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:25 am
Rather than accept defeat, it appealed the TTAB decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:42 am
See Abecassis v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
The “FDA is a regulatory agency whose mandate is to control which drugs are marketed in the United States and how they are marketed. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(EPLAW) District Court of The Hague: Ex parte order based on misleading information: Franz Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co, KG v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Mobil Oil Co., 866 F.2d 1149, 1155 (9th Cir. 1989) (following Associated General Contractors formulation); Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here DECISIONS Roberson Oil Company, Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
The plaintiffs aggregation theory is reminiscent of the 1949 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
