Search for: "United States v. Starks"
Results 361 - 380
of 817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2015, 6:56 am
Griffith, Deceased v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
If you are aware of Medicaid and/or Medicare fraud being committed against the United States government by a city, doctor, hospital, clinic, pharmacy and/or medical supply company, you may be entitled to a multi-million dollar award. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The Trust argued that the reasoning in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) (1999) 1 FLR 193 ECHR was not applicable to the care of hospital patients. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:17 am
United States from a linguistic perspective, arguing that the case “presents about as stark a clash between opposing canons as you could ever hope to find. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
Fisher: “Congress may exclude aliens of a particular race from the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am
“Every major medical organization in the United States has come out against these laws, saying that all they do is hurt women’s health rather than help them,” she said. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:48 am
Co., 4D10-3978; Stark v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am
First and foremost, sports gambling is about to expand in the United States to an unprecedented extent. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
If the VRA still applies, how does it apply when we no longer have in North Carolina the extreme and stark racial polarization of earlier decades? [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:05 am
It seems pretty clear that United 93 was headed for the Capitol on 9/11. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:04 pm
The legal position in England and the United States has now crystallised to leave no manner of doubt that a corporation would be liable for crimes of intent. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Stark and Ezekiel J. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
P. 11 and referred the matterof misconduct to the United States Attorney. 996 F. 2d at296–97. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:00 am
John Marsh, Russell Beck, and I just recorded another episode of the Fairly Competing podcast (which will be available Tuesday morning), and we discussed the latest chapter in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 7:55 am
Issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on August 12, 2019, Naumovski v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:55 pm
On Friday, in Arpaio v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
United States and ex parte Endo. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The answer is complex, simply because it depends on: the actual compensation arrangement being proposed the application of federal law (including Stark and anti kickback rules) to the extent it applies and state law governing self-referral, fee-splitting, kickbacks, and patient brokering Federal law contains numerous exceptions to Stark and "safe harbors" under anti-kickback law. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
The “argument grounded in jurisprudence” concerns developments in the United States and the Commonwealth (at [66] et seq.). [read post]
