Search for: "United States v. Starks" Results 361 - 380 of 817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm by Jerome Noll
  If you are aware of Medicaid and/or Medicare fraud being committed against the United States government by a city, doctor, hospital, clinic, pharmacy and/or medical supply company, you may be entitled to a multi-million dollar award. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
The Trust argued that the reasoning in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) (1999) 1 FLR 193 ECHR was not applicable to the care of hospital patients. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
United States from a linguistic perspective, arguing that the case “presents about as stark a clash between opposing canons as you could ever hope to find. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am by Jackie McDermott
   “Every major medical organization in the United States has come out against these laws, saying that all they do is hurt women’s health rather than help them,” she said. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am by Anthony Gaughan
First and foremost, sports gambling is about to expand in the United States to an unprecedented extent. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm by Richard Pildes
If the VRA still applies, how does it apply when we no longer have in North Carolina the extreme and stark racial polarization of earlier decades? [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:05 am
It seems pretty clear that United 93 was headed for the Capitol on 9/11. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:04 pm
The legal position in England and the United States has now crystallised to leave no manner of doubt that a corporation would be liable for crimes of intent. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
John Marsh, Russell Beck, and I just recorded another episode of the Fairly Competing podcast (which will be available Tuesday morning), and we discussed the latest chapter in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 7:55 am by The Boyd Law Group, PLLC
Issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on August 12, 2019, Naumovski v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The answer is complex, simply because it depends on: the actual compensation arrangement being proposed the application of federal law (including Stark and anti kickback rules) to the extent it applies and state law governing self-referral, fee-splitting, kickbacks, and patient brokering Federal law contains numerous exceptions to Stark and "safe harbors" under anti-kickback law. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
The “argument grounded in jurisprudence” concerns developments in the United States and the Commonwealth (at [66] et seq.). [read post]