Search for: "United States v. Taylor"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,565
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2014, 4:00 am
Make whole any unit employees who retired during or after August 2011 and who have been required to contribute towards the cost of health insurance.* In Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313, the court held that health insurance was not a retirement benefit within the meaning of Article 5, Section 7, of the State Constitution.. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972); see also, Black v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:49 am
”* In contrast, in Kidwell v Transportation Communications Union, 946 F.2d. 283, the Circuit Court held that a union member employed in an agency shop does not have any right to object to his or her union's using part of a member's dues for activities unrelated to collective negotiations. ** Chapter 338 of the Laws of 2008 made the agency shop fee provisions for public employees setout in the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14] permanent for State… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
") (Koppe, M.J.); United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:38 am
UCANN v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:24 pm
KimPages: 1-6Aid in Dying in Canada and the United States: Are U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
Mandatory-minimum statutes generate some of the worst injustices in federal sentencing: a situation not helped by Judge Beezer's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:12 pm
Zywicki of George Mason University School of Law, and Judge Douglas Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit as the moderator. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:54 am
In two cases decided on December 19, 2016, United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:02 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
Although the panel held that the ATS did apply extraterritorially to cover plaintiffs’ claims, it nonetheless remanded the case to the district court to determine whether the suit presented a non-justiciable political question in light of the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Taylor v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:34 am
Yes, a recent case – Taylor v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
Defendant MBS also instructed the Saudi Ambassador to the United States, who was in the United States, to assure Mr. [read post]
