Search for: "United States v. Vermont" Results 361 - 380 of 875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Kelly Schoening
A recent summary order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit – which exercises federal appellate jurisdiction over New York, Connecticut and Vermont — serves as a reminder that an employer’s reliance upon its employee handbook can also prove its undoing. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
 This is the first time that any decision from outside the United States has ever appeared on our year-end best/worst lists. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:58 am by Ronald Mann
The most devastating problem, though, is the position of the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
City of Burlington 15-156Issue: Whether the Federal Aviation Act preempts all state and local general land-use regulation aimed at addressing off-site airport noise, as the Vermont Supreme Court and other state high courts have held, or whether it preempts only those state and local general land-use regulations that conflict with federal law or intrude into a preempted field in their scope and effect, as the Second Circuit and several other federal courts of… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
Ct. 2653 (2011), protecting promotional communications as commercial speech; next, the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
  On July 2, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which covers New York, Connecticut and Vermont, ruled that the lower court erred in finding that unpaid interns should have been deemed “employees” for purposes of coverage under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am by Mark Ashton
This is itself an interesting question in a world where the General Assembly has stated that marriage can only involve a man and woman but the federal court has ruled that this legal distinction is not legally permissible under the United State Constitution. [read post]