Search for: "Unknown Defendants A, B & C"
Results 361 - 380
of 486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
(Attachment "B"). [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
A federal prosecutor would need to prove that a dealer actually knew an object was stolen, but a state prosecutor may simply need to prove that a dealer had reason to believe that an artifact had been stolen, which is a much lower legal burden.More importantly, almost one quarter of the states have a built-in legal assumption that a dealer in goods is presumed to know an object was stolen when (a) the dealer did not reasonably gather information about whether the good was lawfully… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
Part 385 Subpart B (“Subpart B”). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
We will, too.Rather, the plaintiff alleged in Bausch that six days before a Trident was implanted in her, the FDA “informed the defendants that a component . . . was ‘adulterated’ and that [defendant’s] manufacturing processes failed to comply with federal standards. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
I may also offer (c) some normative suggestions about what should be done. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 6:39 am
A copy of his affidavit describing his findings, opinions, and conclusions and the basis of his findings, opinions, and conclusions is attached as Exhibit B. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
Sandvik has made a career of helping journalists cloak their identities online, defending news organizations from hackers and developing tools so reporters can communicate with sources securely. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm
Thus, for diseases for which the causes are largely unknown, such as most birth defects, a differential etiology is of little benefit. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:45 am
You and I both know he still has favors in [C]larksburg! [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
” The case relating to OT2 is therefore also not proceedings which correspond to A 105(1)(a) or (b). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
“Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know” Alan Ackerman, Esq. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
§ 6.602(b). [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
See generally Opposition Brief of Defendants-Appellees Pfizer Inc., Pfizer International LLC, and Greenstone LLC [cited as Pfizer]. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(RelatIP) New procedure at the Brazilian Patent Office for the application of article 32 of the Industrial Property Law (IP tango) Canada 30 more candidates add their support for the copyright pledge (Michael Geist) CBC on copyright pledge (Michael Geist) Copyright pledge gains momentum - Green Party and New Democrats Party (NDP) candidates on board (Michael Geist) Conservative Party platform on copyright (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Michael Geist) Copyright in local election debates (Michael… [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 4:22 pm
The Intersection's condition at the time of the Accident is presently unknown and would likely have been easier to ascertain had timely notice been received. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 1:11 pm
” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 906(b) comment c at 462 (1965). [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm
” At first glance, Professor Volokh’s argument seems logical, but its logic is abstract: A::B as C::D. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
”[2] The defendant, Dr. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 4:24 am
Section 365(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code prevents a debtor-licensee from assigning or assuming an executory contract when (a) the licensor does not consent to the assumption/assignment and (b) applicable law otherwise excuses the licensor from accepting performance or rendering performance to another party. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
B) IFITM may block the cell surface receptor needed by the virus to gain entry. [read post]
