Search for: "Unknown Persons or Claimants"
Results 361 - 380
of 562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2014, 4:15 am
We know that work comp generally is liberally construed in favor of the claimant. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:55 am
They can deal with the pain, it is the unknown that worries them. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:05 pm
In one sense, the possession claim in Manchester Ship Canal Developments v Persons Unknown [2014] EWHC 645 (Ch) follows a fairly predictable course. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:05 pm
In one sense, the possession claim in Manchester Ship Canal Developments v Persons Unknown [2014] EWHC 645 (Ch) follows a fairly predictable course. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
Facts During a journey from Zante, Greece, to East Midlands Airport in the autumn of 2009, the claimant Mr Stott, paralysed and permanently dependent on a wheelchair, suffered from a breach of his rights under the EU’s Disability Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006, as implemented in the United Kingdom by the Civil Aviation (Access to Air Travel for Disabled Persons and Persons with Reduced Mobility) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/1895). [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
Whether this was a deliberate decision motivated by a concern for preserving the proprietary rights of common law couples or a more practical interest in judicial economy is unknown. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:30 am
If so, you are going to look like a hero, especially if your claimant talked about “Bilateral knee pain of unknown origin” to their doctor 5 years ago. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, a claimant who fails to file an administrative claim cannot seek redress in court. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Identification is only possible where the claimant has sufficient information to bring proceedings against the person in question (section 5(4)). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:01 pm
This was, or might have been, disclosed also to other persons who either had viewed, or might have viewed, these same advertisements on the screen of each Claimant’s device” (paragraph 24). [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 6:08 am
Unknown. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 6:08 am
Unknown. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 6:30 am
No matter what the degree, new hires will always come in expecting the unknown. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
Because of the concern that I have expressed above, and because I consider that the point has wider implications, I have given permission to the Claimant to appeal. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
The lack of any kind of statistical data, which in the absence of scientific understanding is all that there would be to go on, is the more inexplicable if the claim is well founded in view of the large number of persons who die of leukemia and of workers in industry who are exposed to benzol. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 3:12 pm
In order to establish their rights as distributees, the claimants, in a kinship proceeding, must prove: 1) their relationship to the decedent; 2) the absence of any person with a closer degree of consanguinity to the decedent; and 3) the number of persons having the same degree of consanguinity to the decedent or to the common ancestor through which they take. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
Are the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases about employee health insurance plan coverage of contraception, writ large, or—as the plaintiffs in those two cases would have it—“only” about coverage of “abortifacients,” or about four discrete forms of birth control? [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:04 am
If the name is unknown, the action may proceed as though such unknown persons were named in the complaint. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
Because the person providing the cross-undertaking is essentially paying the price of an injunction, that person paying the price needs to know with reasonable certainty what the price is: "A party seeking an interim injunction or accepting undertakings in lieu of an interim injunction, is entitled to be aware of an indeterminate and open-ended cross-undertaking in favour of persons unknown." [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 11:07 am
Federal prosecutors disputes the claimants' arguments." [read post]
