Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 361 - 380 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
(Class 99) Component designs – General Court rules on informed user of a motor: Cases T 10/08 and T 11/08 Kwang Yang v OHIM – Honda (Class 99) Two stripes, three stripes and OUT: General Court decision in Case T-479/08 adidas v OHIM – Patrick Holding (Class 46) B&O speaker shape has appeal, so loses appeal: General Court decision in Case T-508/08 Bang & Olufsen v OHIM (IPKat) (Class 99) General Court upholds OHIM’s refusal of PAKI… [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
    He also pointed out that [i]t is equally true that the Application implicates Twitter's due process rights under the 5th Amendment. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: privileges to music: seen as a different subject matter, so booksellers feared it was not covered by common law copyright. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
LPS Real Estate Data Solutions, Inc., supra.The Court of Appeals went on to explain that [w]e review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Brandes  titled "Navigating the Matrimonial Preliminary Conference So You Don’t Sink the Ship". appears in the New York State Bar Association Family Law Review, Winter 2020, Vol. 52, No. 1. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:21 am by Ken White
Notice that the language of that order doesn't just address the one specific comment. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm by Dennis Crouch
So companies like Christian Louboutin should make those shoeboxes red! [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am by Kelly
Irwin Industrial Tool Company (Docket Report) US Copyright New federal education fund grants $2 billion to create OER resources in community colleges (Creative Commons) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Jeff Koons – Koons’s Balloon Dog to pop gallery’s bubble? [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 8:47 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The W&HD says the company failed to pay workers for overtime and failed to pay prevailing wage rates and fringe benefits. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm by Mark Latham
PennEast sought review by the Supreme Court, which was granted. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by INFORRM
After a hearing, the trial court granted dismissal of the harmful access by computer claim but denied dismissal of the remaining claims. [read post]