Search for: "White v. Johnson" Results 361 - 380 of 1,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
The co-authors are Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Michael O’Shea (Oklahoma City), George Mocsary (Connecticut), and me.Below the fold is the full Table of Contents and Preface for the book. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:47 pm
Similar to the Johnson court, albeit in a theft context as opposed to possession, the court in People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm by Russell Spivak, Jordan Brunner
” When staying within the confines of the Administration, though, Johnson relied mostly on the State Department. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:49 am by SHG
From the 9th Circuit decision in Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by David Super
  Other supportfor progressivepositionscomes from voters whose white identity makes them strongly preferthe Republican Party. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:40 pm
Board of Education before the Supreme Court in 1954, which resulted in the famous decision declaring racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, overturning the 1896 decision in Plessy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]