Search for: "William Davis " Results 361 - 380 of 2,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2009, 2:45 am
Davis will get his hearing. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:12 am by Kelly Johnson
Mickelson was named as a “relief defendant” in a criminal case, filed in the Southern District of New York against professional gambler William Walters and a former director of Dean Foods, Thomas Davis. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:12 am
Mickelson was named as a “relief defendant” in a criminal case, filed in the Southern District of New York against professional gambler William Walters and a former director of Dean Foods, Thomas Davis. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 6:18 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
David Williams is president. 35 years ago. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Redding, Islamic Challenges to Pakistan’s Transgender Rights Law, (10 Melbourne Asia Review (2022)).William Wagner, Amicus Brief in Kennedy v Bremerton School District, (U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 9:53 am
Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi along with Attorney Patricia A. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
A County-Level Analysis of the Impact of Abortion Restrictions on Abortion Rates, (Political Economy Research Institute Working Paper No. 573 (March 2023)).Allie Zunski, Ducking the System: Examining the Efficacy of Bounty Hunting Statutes that Stifle the Free Exercise of Constitutional Rights, (William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2022).Kenneth Robert Davis, A Farewell to Harms: Rethinking the Injury Requirements of Title VII,   (Harvard… [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 11:48 am by John Mikhail
  The video is narrated by Wallace Shawn, and other participants include Angela Davis, Roger Waters, Chuck D, Mira Nair, Naomi Klein, Michael Ratner, Tony Kushner, Jonathan Demme, Urvashi Vaid, Jody Williams, Desmond Tutu, and Gloria Steinem, among many others. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 12:00 am by Gibbons P.C.
., Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis, LLP; Donna M. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:41 am by Legal Talk Network
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by constitutional law professor Carlton Larson from UC Davis School of Law, as they talk about sedition as it applies to the actions of the current administration, identify the legal line between sedition and free speech, and define what is and isn't sedition. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]