Search for: "William F. Little" Results 361 - 380 of 1,041
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2017, 3:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
My guess is that the court wasn’t much detained by the problems here, because there is so little controversy about the facts: The connection drawn by the post between Khalifa and Thani seems clearly wrong. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
United States” November 30: “James Wilson and the American Founding,” by William Ewald of the University of Pennsylvania December 6: “Answering the Call: Leaving the Bench to Serve the President – James F. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Matthew Kahn
Most histories of the 25th Amendment begin in the moments after President John F. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Two Jurisdictions in Dispute About Canonical Appeals: London and Canterbury, 1375-6[F. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
William Fratzke was convicted of harassment “because he wrote a nasty letter to a state highway patrolman to protest a speeding ticket. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am by Mitra Sharafi
I sometimes show short movie clips at the start of lecture classes too- I have shown short clips of relevant sections of "Eyes on the Prize" in my Con Law class on Brown v Board and affirmative action/Bakke- not sure it can be streamed but usually your law library will have or can ILL the DVDs- and some "Firing Line" clips of William F Buckley debating the ERA (these are on YouTube), etc.Elizabeth Pleck: Loving v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:52 pm by Nikki Siesel
This argument backfired on Williams-Sonoma because the Registrant’s mark registered under the provision of Section 2(f) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:29 am
In re Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Serial No. 86092589 (June 28, 2017) [not precedential]. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although the justices diverged on some aspects of the case, they did all agree that the statute at issue violated the First Amendment because it constituted “viewpoint-based” regulation of speech, something in which the government has very little authority to engage, unless (as the Court held was not the case here) the government is uttering in its own, government, speech.In the space below, I analyze some of the significant intellectual/doctrinal moves the justices made in the… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:46 pm by Coral Beach
Almost half of the food orders — 47 percent — arrived at temperatures above 40 degrees F. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, William Koski discusses Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]