Search for: "Williams v. Black*" Results 361 - 380 of 2,285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2016, 7:48 am by Jim Gerl
Here is a list: DL v Dist of Columbia 61 IDELR 2, 713 F.3d 120 (DC Cir 4/12/13); Petities by Martin v District of Columbia 55 IDELR 271, 662 F.3d 564 (DC Cir 12/2/11);  Blackman v District of Columbia 46 IDELR 31, 456 F.3d 167 (DC Cir 7/12/06); Lesesne ex rel BF v District of Columbia 45 IDELR 208, 447 F.3d 828 (DC Cir 5/19/06); Whatley &; Williams ex rel Whatley v District of… [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
 Never Too Late 70 [week ending on Sunday 1 November] –  Case T-309/13 Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v OHIM, Gaba International Holding GmbH | Sixteen millions IPKats | Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC v George Vozray et al | Lookalike packaging | Parasite copying | 3D printing | Labouring the point? [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:48 am by Jonathan H. Adler
For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the district court and further conclude that the district court did not err in declining to exercise pendent jurisdiction over the alleged negligence claim under Israeli law.Of particular interest, both of the other judges on the panel — Judge Rogers and Senior Judge Williams — wrote separate concurring opinions addressing the scope of the ATS and the Supreme Court’s decision in Sosa v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Tony Francois highlights Foster v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
“Then time will tell just who fellAnd who’s been left behind”                   Dylan, “Most Likely You Go Your Way” (1966)   When the Daubert case headed to the Supreme Court, it had 22 amicus briefs in tow. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 10:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Oklahoma (Criminal Jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.html Williams v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:32 pm
Supreme Court Justices Blackmun and William Brennan, however, Davies establishes that the tale is not true: Baseball greats Satchel Paige, Jackie Robinson and Roy Campanella all appeared in Blackmun's first draft of the opinion.Likewise interesting, Davies reports that while he sought out Woodward and Armstrong's comments on these findings, no reaction from the duo was received.Davies' complete article is accessible here. [read post]