Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 13,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
Police officers attended during the ongoing confrontation and the PH group subsequently turned the information they had gathered about the appellant over to the police. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
They filed an amicus brief on behalf of former Republican members of Congress, former executive branch members under Republican administrations, and legal experts in support of the respondent in Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:11 am
Also, see, Spencer v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 8:50 am
” [Quoting Nixon v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the… [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Refusing to answer work-related questions in the course of an investigation 2015 NY Slip Op 01573, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe question of compelling a public officer or employee to testify or risk termination was considered by the Court of Appeals in Matt v LaRocca, 71 NY2d 154, cert denied 486 US 1007. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
This morning, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its highly anticipated decision in Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
These commentators look to Myers v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 3:12 pm
" Indeed, as stated in Snyder v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
Proper administration of the photo array did not require defendant's presence and, in fact, the police officer did not even know that the non-victim witness had become available to view the photo array when defendant's detention began. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:17 am
The court dismissed most of the 1st Amendment challenges to the same practices.In Earls v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
"Moreover, it is the function of the administrative agency or the Hearing Officer, not the reviewing court, to weigh the evidence or assess the credibility of witnesses and determine which testimony to accept and which to reject. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
From data the Court received through a brief for Shain v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Singer v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Singer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:05 am
That goes even further than the Obama administration has gone, and than any federal appeals court has gone. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
(This is even clearer in light of the Court’s correct decision in INS v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:34 am
In Colon v The Netherlands, the European Court of Human Rights has scrutinized laws authorizing the search of persons without reasonable suspicion in light of article 8 ECHR.Pursuant to Dutch law, the mayor (Burgomaster) may designate certain areas as ‘security risk area’ for a limited time. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court granted review in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
