Search for: "In re Doe" Results 3781 - 3800 of 107,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2008, 9:57 pm
See Wolfe, 2007 WL 1007181 at *8.The Court is persuaded by the reasoning of those courts that have found that Varity does not establish a bright-line rule at the motion to dismiss stage of the case. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 12:08 am
The Second Circuit also does not require a showing of reliance, but does require a showing of a likelihood of prejudice, which an employer may then rebut through evidence that the deficient SPD was in effect a harmless error. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 1:45 am
Tillett was decided on a full record after conviction and therefore does not speak directly to the issue. 763 F.2d at 630-61. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:39 am
However, we need not decide this broader question because Chhetry appeals from the denial of a motion to reopen; he does not appeal from the BIA's final order of removal. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 12:31 am
  We're really not qualified to judge whether the program is evidence based or total crap. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:12 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1986) (citing In re Keller,642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981)).Ex parte Nehls is citedTheinformational content of the data thus represents non-functional descriptivematerial, which “does not lend patentability to an otherwise unpatentablecomputer-implemented product or process. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:28 am by Joe Patrice
[KING5] * When you're paying $160 million in bribes, you're doing something wrong. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 10:52 am by rainey Reitman
It’s a chance to join the fun, fearless team that introduces funders to the work EFF does. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:05 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Fulton, 391 F.3d 1195, 1201 (Fed. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 6:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Mereargument or conclusory statements inthe specification does not suffice. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 3:36 pm by Michel-Adrien
""The work this Court does is important, and I strongly believe this initiative is necessary. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:02 am
Moore's inclusion of "additional views" in the CAFC's original opinion, concerning the constitutionality of Section 2(a), in which she urged that the court re-visit the CCPA's 1981 decision in In re McGinley in view of the subsequent evolution of First Amendment jurisprudence.The court's Order requests that the parties file new briefs addressing the following question: "Does the bar on registration of disparaging marks in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
"For better or worse, that's on point to what a marijuana dispensary does. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by Susan Landau
The University of Toronto's Citizen Lab has put together a great free resource, Security Planner, a site that provides customized advice on how to securely configure your systems based on which devices you're using, what threats you believe you're facing and what risks you're worried about. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See also In re Fracalossi, 681F.2d 792, 794 (CCPA 1982); In re Pearson, 494 F.2d 1399, 1402 (CCPA1974).Elsewhere:We find the Specification does not define the term “input describing adynamic element” (FF 4) but describes it as providing action to body parts,such as vibration or movement (FF 5). [read post]