Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 29,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 5:13 am
”) United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:12 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:37 am
Held v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
In Burns v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am
I'll go into more detail on that part in the coming days, subject to whatever else will happen, such as a potential new round of Ericsson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:36 pm
Bai v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
Rose’s monthly spousal support payments from $20,000 to $900, based upon his current income level. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:35 am
Dick v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
In Buckley v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
But, for now, there is precedent at both the federal and California state levels upholding class action waivers in arbitration agreements on which employer’s may rely. [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:57 pm
Dept. of Transportation v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
Mandatory retirementMainello v McCall, 252 AD2d 235, motion to appeal dismissed, 93 NY2d 919In 1988 the state amended the Retirement and Social Security Law to change the mandatory age of retirement for certain members of the Police and Firefighters’ Retirement System [PFRS] from age 60 to age 57 [Chapter 795 of the Laws of 1988].State Police Assistant Deputy Superintendent John A. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:54 pm
The district court believed it was entitled to do this pursuant to Apprendi v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:01 am
On the other hand, Bayer v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:21 am
The case of Trigueros v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 6:47 am
The judgement against him in Vigna v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 11:02 pm
ACCA's decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
Turns out it also is apropos for this week’s court of appeals decision in State v. [read post]
