Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 20,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm
[Bonus: Calling someone a "nut" isn't libel.] [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:17 pm
For that matter, if the U.S. securities laws do not apply to the OT [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
This makes it clear: compliance with Section 103(b) is voluntary (if it wasn’t, similar actions would not be “otherwise voluntar[y]). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:25 am
If plaintiff “A” believes defendant “B” unduly influenced an elderly parent to make a series of inter vivos gifts to B, who’s to say A has a stake in the outcome. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:00 pm
She can't, and doesn't want to, pass the bill without a substantial number of Republican votes. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:27 am
After all, there’s pretty much never fee-shifting in defendants’ direction under the Lanham Act, although the statute does provide for it (or for that matter for frivolous copyright claims) But good luck on that. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 7:37 am
In NCS Techs., B-417956 et al. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:17 am
If I don’t much care for the content of your site, it would be virtually costless for me to turn you in and exclaim loudly “Won’t someone please think of the children! [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 8:38 am
6) The justices eat during oral argument. 7) The justices discuss legal matters together during lunch. 8) Justice Sonia Sotomayor doesn’t cook Puerto Rican food. 9) Bread should be served with pasta. 10) I have spent entirely too much time preparing this post. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
But it doesn’t matter, because you can’t run through the Polaroid factors on a motion to dismiss. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:38 pm
If your divorce involves matters related to child custody, call the Texas attorneys at the McClure Law Group at 214.692.8200. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 8:09 pm
The MBA wasn't alone. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 1:19 pm
([Online lecture] “You can’t stop the signal”: From the past to the future of digitally mediated sustainability due diligence? [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Don't have any now.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNO. 08-998JAN HAMILTON, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, PETITIONER v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
We also get some information about B herself. [read post]
28 May 2008, 3:27 am
Gee - she's sort of close to the line, isn't she? [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
§ 3101(b). [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:11 am
The Supreme Court affirmed Matter of Wang purely under Chevron deference in Scialabba v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 4:36 am
" *Whatever the terms of the CBA, the Court of Appeals said that "[t]he merits of such defense shall be considered and determined as part of the arbitration award or hearing officer decision. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 1:42 pm
But that's a matter for another post. [read post]
