Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 36,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2007, 4:45 am
"[*P13] In the instant case, however, we are asked to consider as a matter of first impression in this Commonwealth whether an officer may similarly order a passenger of a lawfully stopped vehicle to remain inside or get back into the vehicle. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 3:13 am
This can be found in Florida Statute s. 95.11(3)(c). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:59 am
(Elevance), is a Medicare Advantage organization, also known as a Part C plan, operating in South Florida. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:49 am
While prompt resolution of your legal matter is our goal, our approach is fundamentally different. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:42 pm
Even if matters are finally resolved, the process takes years at the WCB – years during which a family may be cut off from meaningful support. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 7:00 am
Philosopher Martha C. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:33 pm
A properly instructed jury, as Learned Counsel Rick Kammen explains, must be told that each individual can decide not to impose death as a moral matter. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:48 am
It is clear that the AG is of the opinion that the patent did not “specifically and precisely” identify emtricitabine for the purposes of Article 3(a) although, as the AG acknowledges, this is a matter for the national court to decide. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 2:22 pm
While prompt resolution of your legal matter is our goal, our approach is fundamentally different. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 3:41 am
., LLC, No. 17 C 9154, Slip Op. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
In its controversial ruling in Case C-530/12, OHIM v National Lottery Commission [extensively reported by the IPKat here],the focus was on the probative value of national law: does it need to be considered by OHIM and by the General Court as a matter of fact or as a matter of law? [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:23 am
A detailed claim construction is ordinarily necessary to determine whether that claim is directed to statutory subject matter. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Meridian Limited), heard 22-24… [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-18 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited &… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Meridian Limited), heard 22-24… [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am
On Thursday 18 June 2020, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in In the matter of XY (Scotland). [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi and others (Respondents) v The Security Service and others (Appellants), heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq (Respondent), heard 24 – 27 January 2011 R (on the… [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 6:16 am
The fact remains though, that we have a justice system which demands certain fundamental protections in order to ensure that trials are fair...and these protections cannot be trumped no matter how well-intentioned the government.With all due respect to Bill C-32, rather than conduct unfair trials with near absolute liability on alleged impaired drivers, why not just say zero tolerance...ANY alcohol within 24 hours of driving means a criminal charge. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:04 pm
Rasnick and Margaret C. [read post]
