Search for: "OR Specific, Inc." Results 3781 - 3800 of 37,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2010, 5:54 pm
The Dallas Court of Appeals recently held that the answer to this question is yes; however, the Court based its decision on the specific facts of the case and not on a bright-line rule. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:47 am by Kelley Chittenden and Jason Gordon
In addition to deceptive acts and practices and unfair billing practices, the FTC charged Pact, Inc. with a specific violation of section 4 of the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA) due to the Pact app’s negative option feature, defined by FTC Telemarketing Sales Rules as a provision in which consumer silence or failure to take affirmative action operates as acceptance. 16 C.F.R. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:47 am by Kelley Chittenden and Jason Gordon
In addition to deceptive acts and practices and unfair billing practices, the FTC charged Pact, Inc. with a specific violation of section 4 of the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA) due to the Pact app’s negative option feature, defined by FTC Telemarketing Sales Rules as a provision in which consumer silence or failure to take affirmative action operates as acceptance. 16 C.F.R. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 11:04 am
Blockbuster, Inc. is a Dallas, Texas-based retailer of home video and video game rentals. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:32 pm
California - Reversing an earlier panel judgment, the Federal Circuit in Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:07 pm
California - Reversing an earlier panel judgment, the Federal Circuit in Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:56 am by Tim Eavenson
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Rent-a-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 5:29 am
Commonwealth Canvas, Inc., 2008 WL 162757 (N.D. [read post]