Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 3781 - 3800 of 4,575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am by Rosalind English
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532  and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate standard of… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:03 pm by Kara OBrien
It is precisely in such jurisprudential vacuums that courts often insert themselves with harsh and unfortunate consequences for the unwary. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:51 pm by Jeff Gamso
The standard way of raising the question has been by a civil rights claim (the state will be violating my constitutional rights, the condemned plaintiff says, by killing me in a cruel and painful fashion) under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the US Code. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
  She reminds us that there are standards of care for research science and for clinical medicine, and standards for evaluating whether experimental results can be “honestly” attributed to the data. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
(The justice used the legal term for such a lawsuit, called an "action in ejectment. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm by Mark Zamora
This device, the "Implantable Pulse Generator Advanced Bionics Precision SCS, Model number IPG SC-1110" (hereafter, the "Device"), is used to treat back pain. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
Again, the standard is whether the differences between the two devices are merely colorable. [read post]