Search for: "People v High"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 14,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 4:29 am
KenyaEG v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
Part of having transparency in the tax code is having the people’s representatives decide if there will be a tax increase. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, February 4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 8:14 pm
The English High Court of Justice decision in Seadrill Ghana Operations Ltd v Tullow Ghana Ltd also illustrates how common law courts internationally might treat a force majeure claim. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Dame Frances Cairncross led an independent review into the sustainability of high-quality journalism in the UK which was published in February last year. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
I n September 2019, in R (Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales, the High Court ruled that the use of FRT by South Wales Police was, in those specific instances, lawful (the case was brought by Ed Bridges, a member of the public, who believed his image had been captured on FRT from a police van whilst he was shopping in Cardiff city centre). [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 10:47 am
Carroll v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am
In Qualcomm v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:09 am
Aside from the tax issue addressed herein (and people used to say 1/3 for the husband, 1/3 for the wife and 1/3 for the government – though the numbers never actually worked that way), what is the justification for giving the income earner more than the recipient in light of Crews v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
” In an op-ed at Newsweek, Alida Garcia warns that “[ICE] admits it is reopening previously closed removal cases of DACA recipients, [which] could allow [the agency] to start detaining and deporting people as quickly as possible if the Supreme Court gives it the green light” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm
So we are being treated to the back-and-forth especially as to how to interpret the truly unfortunate phrase "high crimes and misdemeanor. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:55 am
Baidu case (here), where the Beijing High Court addressed the copyright issues of an AI-generated work. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
As I wrote at the time, those documents were high level and vague, and the board’s power would depend on practical and operational matters. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:07 pm
The assertions by the Defendants that the Claimant was so dishonest she was unfit to be an MP led to a high award of £75,000 considering the limited extent of publication and that the meaning was only Chase Level 2 of reasonable grounds to suspect. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am
In such a situation, when precedent provides few answers and the stakes are enormously high, the debate should focus on first principles—the fundamental reasons for a particular action or doctrine. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:01 am
Similarly, in R.E. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
Media lawyer Paul Tweed, who is acting for Mrs Foster, said: “I can confirm that Dr Jessen has been put on notice that we are in the process of issuing defamation proceedings in the High Court in Belfast. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Barron and Woyton v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Barron and Woyton v. [read post]
