Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 19,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2008, 6:23 am
New York City has a long love affair with daredevils. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
”) People v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:43 am
As discussed in past posts about the long-running Facebook biometric privacy class action, users are challenging Facebook’s “Tag Suggestions” program, which scans for and identifies people in uploaded photographs for photo tagging. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
This strategy might cause people to remember that the Governor of Arkansas in the 1950's claimed that Brown v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:36 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:39 am
On the contrary, with the Tea Party seizing on Article V to demand repeal of numerous Amendments ratified by the American people over the full sweep of our history, it is critical for the American people to understand the full arc of our constitutional story and to take our Constitution back. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:20 pm
Nothing is wholly without risk, but so long as the councils do the best that can professionally be done to minimise identifiable risks to frail and elderly people in their care, the law had no immediate role to play. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Everyone agreed that progress may not be as fast or as far as we might hope, but that we've come a long way to make good on the promise that "all men are created equal" for people of color, women, those who are or are not religious, people with disabilities, and those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:30 pm
" — Chief Justice Earl Warren in Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The much-anticipated decision in NT 1 & NT 2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) was handed down on 13 April 2018. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:35 am
Labor Relations Today has a good recap: In the order issued on Friday, March 2 in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
(I oversimplify here, but the post is already too long.) [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:15 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 7:32 am
More generally, thanks to the organizations and people involved for recognizing that we're all in this together: pro-life people who oppose Hill v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
USA v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
We disagree. * * * "Indiana has long held "that after support obligations have accrued, a court may not retroactively reduce or eliminate such obligations. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 11:05 am
Supreme Court in Hamdan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
Additional Resources: Espinoza v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
(When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
