Search for: "People v. Michaels"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 4,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 7:35 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that you report… [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
This from Sandrine Giroud, Partner at LALIVE in Geneva:I am proud to announce that the Geneva Bar Association includes as of today the role of lawyers in the protection of human rights in its Professional Code of Conduct in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm
I discussed it at length when the Supremes decided Caperton v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
The core of this may be two people but, in some cultures, (such as those that recognise polygamy or polyandry) it may be more than two people. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 6:58 am
(Attia et al v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Case law The Spencer v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:56 am
Since CAIP v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am
Michael Crowley reports for the New York Times. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
Christian Sierra, Jennifer Hansler and Michael Conte report for CNN. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm
The vehicle would have a seating capacity of five people, including one pilot, and would use electric power. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
In August, The Trace presented a conspiracy about the amicus briefs filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:26 pm
Read the opinion here: Atwater v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:39 pm
Thus Michael D. [read post]
