Search for: "People v. Profit"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 4,430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
Cardin (D-MD) recently introduced the “Newspaper Revitalization Act,” which would allow newspapers to become tax-exempt non-profits in an effort to help them stay afloat. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm
PCMC further argued that the six-factor “charitable purpose” test first established by the Illinois Supreme Court in 1968 in Methodist Old People’s Home v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
Syracuse University v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:05 pm
In Sonzinsky v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
The Judgment extracted below would be very useful to understand the things practically and it is very useful for the people who have invested huge amounts in the Company thinking that they will get their rightful share and rights in the Company. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:47 pm
In Borland’s Trustee v Steel Brothers and Company Ltd (1901) 1 Ch 279 the court described a share is “an interest of a shareholder in the company measured by a sum of money, for the purpose of liability in the first place, and of interest in the second, but also consisting of a series of mutual covenants entered into by all the shareholders inter se. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:59 pm
Courts in 1953 in Halean v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:34 pm
It is not a surprise to many people that hospitals are facing financial difficulties. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
"So when Angelina Mike gets $365,000 in 2000, which is her share of her tribe's casino profits, California can tax it. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:18 pm
From Arthur v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
While Arizona may be able to determine if their proposal would be profitable, as a result of the Floridian proposal, it may not be the most profitable. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:22 am
Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 4:27 am
The Australian judge in Roadshow v iiNet got the technology right. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
If we didn’t trust the people to make decisions based on all available information, if we didn’t trust the people to be able to filter speech according to its source and content, if we didn’t trust the people to know what is good for them, we wouldn’t let the Nazi’s march. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
If we didn’t trust the people to make decisions based on all available information, if we didn’t trust the people to be able to filter speech according to its source and content, if we didn’t trust the people to know what is good for them, we wouldn’t let the Nazi’s march. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
See Colacicco v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:39 pm
Most people think of "debt relief" organizations as non-legal organizations, including some that are for profit. [read post]
