Search for: "People v. Wills" Results 3781 - 3800 of 5,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am by INFORRM
The right has gone, but the discretion in the hands of an independent judiciary should surely have maintained that right in cases such as these – where a man who is a public servant and representative of the people is accused of breaching the ethical standards implicit in his very important role. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
Originally, it was used as a way to govern relations between nations, but now it is being utilized by human rights activists in order to hold corporations responsible for acts performed by their subsidiaries which infringe upon the rights of people in foreign nations in which the company resides. [1] The Act reads: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  They are literally the only people whose opinions genuinely count in his version of the law. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
  The decision was overturned on appeal (Secretary of State for Justice v A Local Authority & Ors (Rev2) [2021] EWCA Civ 1527). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 12:29 am by Andres
It seems clear to me reading the facts that Dr Duffy was a willing participant in an old-fashioned Internet flame war with various people at Kasamba, and that she was the first one to use the Ripoff Report to publish potentially defamatory statements. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Stephen Lee
Citing the 1971 decision in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
In other words, the risk is not just about what the lawyer is willing to do, but what she is no longer able to do. [read post]