Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK" Results 3781 - 3800 of 7,218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Clarke (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.htmlWe feature articles about the recent White House Tribal Leaders Conference as well as a settlement of mismanaged monetary assets and natural resources held in trust by the United States for the benefit of tribes. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:40 pm by James Yang
Patent Guidance From the rules, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) produces guides to implement the rules. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:06 am
The new TTAB Rules have been published today in the Federal Register (pdf here), along with the following summary.Miscellaneous Changes to Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Rules; Final Rule [72 FR 42242]SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) is amending the Trademark Rules of Practice (trademark rules) to require plaintiffs in Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) inter partes proceedings to serve… [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:49 pm by Florian Mueller
It is particularly well known that juries rarely ever invalidate patents, and that may be the reason why Apple didn't focus on that invalidity defense in San Diego (also, I see no indication that the motion for judgment as a matter of law was withdrawn in whole or in part).The '490 patent is likely invalid in the opinion of the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO),… [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:38 am by U.S.P.T.O.
Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today published final rules of practice implementing the first-inventor-to-file provision of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm by Florian Mueller
A couple of hours ago Samsung proudly informed Judge Koh of the fact that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has tentatively rejected, in a first Office action dated December 29 (mailing date), all 21 claims of U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 8:20 am
[14] Field, supra note 2 (stating that trademark and copyright protection is generally cheaper than patent protection because the former protect only against exact copying of the original, whereas patents protect ideas and concepts, as well as tangible goods) [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:40 pm by James Yang
Patent Guidance From the rules, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) produces guides to implement the rules. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 11:34 am by FDABlog HPM
§ 154(a)(2) (post-GATT/URAA) states the following with respect to the term of a patent: “Subject to the payment of fees under this title, such grant shall be for a term beginning on the date on which the patent issues and ending 20 years from the date on which the application for the patent was filed in the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:39 pm by Aaron Barkoff
The complete agenda is as follows: Day 1: India Patent Scenario in India Patentability in the Pharmaceutical Industry Section 3(d) of the Indian Patent Act Data Exclusivity Compulsory Licensing Patent Oppotions in India--Current Trends Trademarks and Copyrights Day 2: United States The United States Patent System The Hatch-Waxman Act Paragraph IV Certifications The America Invents Act Biosimilars in the… [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 8:44 pm by James Yang
  Under a first inventor to file rule, because you mailed it to your self and didn’t file the patent application with the USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office), you did not establish a priority date. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
No. 1266, filed on July 20, 2012):"The court may also consider the patent’s prosecution history, which consists of the complete record of proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office ('U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:19 am by Florian Mueller
Huawei filed more than 3,500 patent applications (more than any other company, with Samsung a close second) last year with the European Patent Office alone, and is the number 5 patent filer with the United States Patent & Trademark Office.You can actually see the number of European patent applications, with only the first digit being hidden (but easy to infer from the other parts of the column chart), behind Huawei's IP… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:55 pm by James Yang
Under the first-inventor-to-file system, the inventor who first files a patent application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office is awarded the patent. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:15 am
Cl. 1976) which held the United States Government liable for direct patent infringement of a patented radio navigation system under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 8:34 am by Alexandre Miura
 Trade MarksPatentlyO reported on a recent rejection by the Federal Circuit of gTLD's trademark registration for .SUCKSThe TTABlog published reports on two interesting decisions (i) the first was a decision of the USPTO regarding two trade marks in classes 30, 35 and 40 and considered the risk of confusion between the rejected mark and the CRC Kosher Certification Mark; (ii) the second was a decision of the United States District Court for the District… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Sarah Friedman
OCF then brought its case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which ruled that OCF could register the color pink as a trademark in In re Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 774 F.2d 1116 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 2:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Newman's dissent:I write because of the importance of this decision tothe judicial structure of patent adjudication, and thefuture of a nationally consistent United States patent law.In this case, the complaint states that the asserted violationof patent law may support violation of antitrustlaw—a Walker Process pleading based on charges of fraudor inequitable conduct in prosecution of the patent appli-cation in the… [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 4:34 am by Florian Mueller
Finally, to the extent that the Commission majority's analysis herein is otherwise inconsistent with the analysis in his dissenting views, he affirms the analysis in his dissenting views.And here's the full text of the public redacted version of his dissenting statement:PUBLIC VERSIONDISSENTING VIEWS OF COMMISSIONER PINKERT ONTHE COMMISSION'S ISSUANCE OFAN EXCLUSION ORDER AND A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDERAlthough I concur with my colleagues on all issues related to claim construction, infringement, and… [read post]