Search for: "US Inventor"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 7,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2018, 7:22 pm
Here, the focus was on written description — the requirement that the disclosure clearly allows a PHOSITA “to recognize that the inventor invented what is claimed” and that the “inventor had possession of the claimed subject matter as of the filing date. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 10:03 pm
These observations led the present inventor to the claimed co-culturing methods. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:11 am
Cir. 2009) (citing Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1314) (hold- ing that the claims at issue did not require the use of a “key” where the inventor had omitted the requirement in those claims while explicitly reciting it in other claims, thereby demonstrating an intent to claim a different scope); see also Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:53 am
The patent claims use of a hierarchy of data structures for creating a dynamic document. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Accordingly, I dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc.Of patentee as lexicographer:However, the specification cannot be used to narrow a claim term – to deviate from the plain and ordinary meaning – unless the inventor acted as his own lexicographer or intentionally disclaimed or disavowed claim scope. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:05 pm
Where the number of inventors increases, the underlying romantic notion of inventorship — the solitary inventor — becomes an anachronism. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:48 pm
The manager of product design at Apple, Fletcher Rothkopf, is listed as the inventor. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Those programs are essential tools for a patent attorney, patent agent, or any inventor who has filed an application pro per. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
House members hear why ITU can't be trusted with Internet regulation Vint Cerf, co-inventor of TCP/IP, testified Thursday before a House committee. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Although descriptive marks are tempting to use, due to their very descriptive nature, use of such marks is generally ill-advised. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 6:05 pm
The US Supreme Court took a very narrow view of scope of employment, writing in 79 U.S. 246 (1870):>>If an officer in the military service, not specially employed to make experiments with a view to suggest improvements, devises a new and valuable improvement in arms, tents, or any other kind of war material, he is entitled to the benefit of it, and to letters- patent for the improvement from the United States, equally with any other citizen not engaged in such service; and the… [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:55 am
These marginal advances in retrospect may seem deceptively simple, particularly when retracing the path already blazed by the inventor. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Documents concerning public uses of the invention (e.g., trade show documents). [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:29 pm
Good news for patent lawyers, you can now search available patents using google. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
a (Class 46) India Claiming with a purpose, with the blessings of an inventor (SiNApSE) Institutional capacity of the patent office... the next big challenge??? [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Michelson supports patent reform (Patently-O) US law reform: Prefiling protection for inventors under revised S515 (CanadaPatentBlog) US Patents USPTO to host independent inventors’ roundtable – 29 March, 2010 (Daily Dose of IP) It’s not easy being green: Navigating the USPTO’s Green Tech Pilot Program (Green Patent Blog) Northern District of Illinois: False patent marking capitol of the world (Chicago IP Litigation) False marking:… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
a (Class 46) India Claiming with a purpose, with the blessings of an inventor (SiNApSE) Institutional capacity of the patent office... the next big challenge??? [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:27 am
” A successful attack on the inventor or his lawyer will destroy the patent, no matter how valid the patent and how sound the invention. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 7:18 am
Note here that this calculation is a bit different from the disposals that the USPTO uses for its examiner counts. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:48 pm
The somewhat convoluted 102(e) indicates that a US patent application becomes prior art once it is either published or issues as a patent. [read post]
