Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 3781 - 3800 of 29,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2016, 9:05 am by Robin Shea
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to the Supreme Court vacancy created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In Google v CNIL, the Court of Justice of the European Union was called to decide whether European data protection law could apply globally and under what conditions. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
S., at 184; Flook, supra, at 588, n. 9; Cochrane v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 9 March 2011, in the case of MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)) Mrs Justice Sharp granted a privacy injunction to restrain the publication of a range of information which tended to identify the claimant and which related to the subject matter of the action. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:20 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court granted review of a government case (Sebelius v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 3:19 am
Indeed, the last time the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a particular mode of execution - more than 100 years ago, in the case of Wilkerson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Series of Essays
The death of late Justice Antonin Scalia last term created uncertainty for Court-watchers and may well have affected the outcome in a number of key cases—including United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Those extensions, however, were never challenged in any court and certainly not considered by this Court.CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST: Well, doesn't that itself mean something, Mr. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by Chijioke Okorie
The court noted the decision of the Court of Appeal in The Procter and Gamble Company v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On Monday 27 September 2010, Mrs Justice Sharp handed down an important judgment in a privacy case which had previously been the subject of a so-called “super injunction”. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:11 am by Lori Paul
The court is being asked to undo the $65 million settlement reached in theFacebook v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:17 pm
In reversing in the interest of justices, the Court wroteas defendant correctly contends, the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of the People's witnesses during both his opening and closing statements (see People v LaDolce, 196 AD2d 49, 57; see generally People v Bailey, 58 NY2d 272, 277-278). [read post]