Search for: "A B C Insurance" Results 3801 - 3820 of 5,818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
   Federal and state courts have risen to meet that need, articulating a definition that is widely accepted today: (a) a tax is an exaction imposed for the primary purpose of raising revenue for general spending,   (b) a fee is an exaction imposed for the primary purpose of recovering from the payor the cost of providing a particular service to the payor, and   (c) a penalty is an exaction… [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
" Because the statute expressly requires the court to both make and explain that determination (DRL 236[B][5-a][c][2][b] ), the Appellate Division could [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:10 am by emagraken
 159 and 160 of the Act; (b) that the defendant driver failed to meet the requisite standard of care; and (c) that the defendants are solely at fault for the collision. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:09 am by William Carleton
The aggregate amount sold to any investor inreliance upon this exemption within the previous 12-month period shall not exceed $1,000.For purposes of this individual investment limitation, the following investors shall betreated as one investor: (A) Any relative, spouse or relative of the spouse of an investor whohas the same principal residence as the investor; (B) Any trust or estate in which an investor and any related person as specified in paragraph (b)(2)(A) or… [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 9:48 am
The owner of the dog shall be responsible for all costs associated with evaluations and training ordered under this section; "(b) secure, humane confinement of the dog for a period of time and in a manner deemed appropriate by the court but in all instances in a manner designed to: (1) prevent escape of the dog, (2) protect the public from unauthorized contact with the dog, and (3) to protect the dog from the elements pursuant to section [353-b] of this chapter. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 5:12 am by Nicole Vinson
But compare this to section 15(b), which states that a public adjuster may not restrict or prevent an insurer or its representative from reasonable access at reasonable times to an insured or the insured property. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:55 am by Drake Law Firm
Examples of potential third-parties include: a. subcontractors b. product manufacturers c. supervisory co-employees d. fabricators or installers of injury-causing machinery e. parent company of the employer To see how this works, let's use the following example: you are asked to drive your supervisor's car to Birmingham to make a delivery. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Rule 23(c)(1)(B) The Seventh Circuit concluded that a “precise definition of the class, claims, issues and defenses” was necessary: (1) under the plain text of Rule 23(c)(1)(B); (2) in order to provide an appropriate basis for appellate review; and (3) so that parties can adequately prepare for a class action trial. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:49 pm
April 12, 2011, CCH Business Franchise Guide ¶14,577) after losing throughout the unemployment compensation administrative process on the issue of whether a concrete artisan who had been an employee and then became a licensed dealer was still an employee for purposes of unemployment insurance, the dealer filed a court proceeding. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 10:15 am by Michael Thomas
The former limitation period of six years was held to apply by virtue of sections 24(2) and (4) of the Limitations Act, S.O. 2002, C. 24 Schedule B. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 10:15 am by Michael Thomas
The former limitation period of six years was held to apply by virtue of sections 24(2) and (4) of the Limitations Act, S.O. 2002, C. 24 Schedule B. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:48 pm
The owner of the dog shall be responsible for all costs associated with evaluations and training ordered under this section; "(b) secure, humane confinement of the dog for a period of time and in a manner deemed appropriate by the court but in all instances in a manner designed to: (1) prevent escape of the dog, (2) protect the public from unauthorized contact with the dog, and (3) to protect the dog from the elements pursuant to section [353-b] of this chapter. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Gretchen Harders
  PPACA authorizes the Secretary to issue ex parte cease and desist orders when it appears that the conduct of a MEWA is:  (a) fraudulent; (b) creates an immediate danger to the public safety or welfare; or (c) is causing or is expected to cause significant, imminent and irreparable public injury. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:25 am by Mark S. Humphreys
B-0002-02 January 2, 2002 TO: REGULATED PERSONS AND ENTITIES, INCLUDING ALL INSURANCE COMPANIES, CORPORATIONS, EXCHANGES, MUTUALS, RECIPROCALS, ASSOCIATIONS, LLOYD'S, HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS, ... [read post]