Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 4,702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
” There is substantial authority to the effect that “bribery” is a generic designation and does not limit predicate acts to state laws that are specifically labeled as bribery. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
II, § 1, cl. 5 … . [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 8:23 am
The law was initially scheduled to take effect January 1, 2020. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 3:07 am
It does not matter if the provider lacked any specific intent to commit a violation of this statute. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Use of irradiation also does not prevent post-processing contamination during transport or by the retailer or consumer during food preparation and handling. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
Sources: OECD, “Table II.1. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 5:30 am
Fla. 40% 12 Ga. 32% 32 Hawaii (a) 104% 1 Idaho 38% 14 Ill. 23% 43 Ind. 40% 13 Iowa 35% 22 Kan. 36% 19 Ky. 36% 20 La. 37% 18 Maine 41% 10 Md. 26% 39 Mass. 22% 45 Mich. 36% 20 Minn. 33% 31 Miss. 47% 7 Mo. 31% 34 Mont. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
He also does not discuss what would be the crux of Part III.C: that there were no "no legal consequences" for going uninsured. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If Pinnock and proportionality did apply then the Supreme Court would need to grapple with the detail of how proportionality should operate, procedurally and substantively (issues 1-4 above). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If Pinnock and proportionality did apply then the Supreme Court would need to grapple with the detail of how proportionality should operate, procedurally and substantively (issues 1-4 above). [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 2:23 pm
1. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
” Rose does not require a formal medical record to recall how things went for her daughter over the next several days. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am
Table 1. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Well, eliminating that kind of mutual ignorance is one of the things that this blog’s all about, so we thought we’d take a look at how §2 of the Third Restatement is faring these days.We see three important issues wrapped up in the Third Restatement – these being, (1) risk/utility balancing as the basic means of assessing liability, (2) the requirement of a feasible alternative design, and (3) employment of negligence-based “reasonableness" as the test. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:05 pm
Investigators from the Centers for Disease and Prevention provide assistance to state officials during outbreaks that are defined by state boundaries, but the federal agency does not include one-state outbreaks in its regular reporting. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
A substantially similar version of this article was initially published in Issue No. 1 2012 of the Business Law News of the California State Bar. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
, supra, p. 1.) [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am
The CJEU argued, however, that there is no equivalent autonomous concept in the Regulation, that art. 5 no. 3 must be interpreted restrictively and that the plaintiff could instead have sued under art. 5 no. 1 or art. 6 no. 1 of the Regulation. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 8:45 am
Ruling 87-41, 1987-1, Cum. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:26 pm
Company officials also provided the plaintiffs with an updated version of the draft S-1. [read post]
