Search for: "In re F. E."
Results 3801 - 3820
of 7,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 pm
De manière générale, une Chambre n'annule pas une décision correcte, même si les motifs sont incorrects.La Chambre n'annule donc pas la décision de la section de dépôt. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Ce projet de recherche a été financé par une agence fédérale. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 1:44 pm
Fue aprobado por Resolución Legislativa Nº 29843 y finalmente ratificado por Decreto Supremo Nº 022-2012-RE, del 25 de abril de 2012. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 12:31 pm
Ri︠e︡ka Sochi [Sochi. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am
The new year is off to a fast start with a number of decisions addressing key e-discovery issues, including a decision from the Seventh Circuit regarding the Dec. 9, 2013 sanctions order issued by the district court in the In Re Pradaxa multi-district products liability litigation and a spoliation finding against the defendants in the In Re Actos multi-district products liability litigation. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:00 pm
Le mandataire a indiqué dans l'en-tête de son courrier le nom correct, et a utilisé la même référence interne que celle employée en première instance par le précédent mandataire. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
You can read those posts for an introduction to the issue if you’re unfamiliar with it, but the short version is that in California (and some other states), the courts give constitutional protection not only to the amount of public employees’ pensions that has been earned by past service, but also to employees’ right to keep earning a pension based on rules that are at least as generous for as long as they stay employed. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
[F]reedom of religion matters to our national security.... [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
The Court of Appeals’ contrary analysis rests on its misreading of In re Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, 243 Wis. 2d 204, 626 N.W.2d 725. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
Confidentiality requirements (41 CFR §60-300.42(d-e); 41 CFR §60-741.42(e)). [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm
See, e.g., In re Greene, 223 F. 3d 1064 (9th Cir. 2000). [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
February 19, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Drew Estate Holding Company LLC, Serial No. 77840485 [Section 2(e)(3) refusal to register KUBA KUBA BY DREW ESTATE on the ground that the mark is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of "Cigars made with Cuban seed tobacco"] [Note that in In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate 97 USPQ2d 1640 (TTAB 2011) [precedential], the Board found the mark KUBA KUBA to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of… [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Le 2 septembre suivant, une lettre d’entente a été signée entre la GRC et Tremblay. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:33 pm
It has quasi-executive power to issue licenses for dental practice, and to conduct investigations “into any practices committed in th[e] State that might violate” the laws that it enforces. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:53 am
* In re Gustavo R. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:12 pm
Cir. 1983); see also In re Gershon, 372 F.2d 535, 538 (CCPA 1967). [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
C’est cette dernière décision, prononcée le 31 mai 2011, qui est l’objet de l’appel. [10] La question est donc : l’appelante démontre-t-elle que le juge de première instance a erré en ordonnant l’arrêt des procédures relatives aux chefs autres que complot de meurtre et meurtre, au motif que les délais, auxquels s’ajoutaient des délais anticipés, étaient… [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:05 pm
Lixões industriais e municipais Anos de vida perdidos: 1,234 milhões Lixo doméstico, pilhas, sucata e resíduos agrícolas, hospitalares e de processos industriais. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:05 pm
Lixões industriais e municipais Anos de vida perdidos: 1,234 milhões Lixo doméstico, pilhas, sucata e resíduos agrícolas, hospitalares e de processos industriais. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]