Search for: "In re John M"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 8,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 7:07 am
Though I'm not sure I can add much useful insight to the polyphony already out there about the Supreme Court decision in the Affordable Care Act case, the question that's moving me to blog, now that we're a few days out, is whether Chief Justice John Roberts in fact succeeded in his ostensible goal--that is, convincing the nation that this was not a politically or ideologically driven decision and that the Supreme Court is not a political/ideological… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm
No Man Is An Island John Donne, 1572 – 1631 No man is an island, Entire of itself. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:31 pm
The taxing power argument, which I'm not very happy, is an afterthought. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 2:28 am
Graves, Serial No. 77761950 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of AMERICAN JUSTICE FOUNDATION for "promoting the interests of the legal and justice system" and for "providing a website featuring educational information in the fields of the legal and justice system"].July 11, 2012 - 11 AM: In re Shawn M. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
I’m not ruling on it, I’m not deciding it, but I’m merely identifying some concerns. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 8:17 am
This is, I'm guessing, about bringing the UVA family back together. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:31 am
But it did produce some pretty funny responses ("Saying you're moving to Canada cause you're upset about Obamacare is like saying you're moving to Hogwarts cause you're upset about magic. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:31 am
But it did produce some pretty funny responses ("Saying you're moving to Canada cause you're upset about Obamacare is like saying you're moving to Hogwarts cause you're upset about magic. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:45 am
Here’s the scenario: You’re a well-known athlete. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:44 am
DUST NLRB Using Tech 2 Reach PPL re: PCA? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:40 am
I know you're all poring over the Affordable Care Act, now that we have to comply with it, and trying to decide whether Chief Justice John Roberts is an evil turncoat, or a hero, or a "double agent" for the ACA's opponents . . . or for its advocates. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:36 am
They're interested in the technology of interoperability and the implications of this for nationalization and globalization. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:10 pm
JOHN CORNYN, R-Texas: Glad to do it. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:01 pm
And I'm sure that they also were getting worried. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm
National Law Journal photos by Diego M. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:09 am
Re-elect the President, and it will likely stand. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:04 am
"If the president is re-elected, then this law will go forward," he said. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:59 am
will re-ignite an interest among legal historians about how Marshall's concern for building the Supreme Court as an institution influenced his decision-making? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
"My guess is they're not sleeping too well at the White House tonight. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am
On Monday, Justice Elena Kagan, joined by Anthony M. [read post]
