Search for: "In re T. W."
Results 3801 - 3820
of 8,740
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2015, 8:30 am
Although the Patent Office attempted to re-create its early records, its 1847 index of patent-holders erroneously listed Hopkins's residence as Vermont. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:23 am
More complicated is the politics around automatic re-imposition of economic restrictions — "snapback" — in the event of Iranian noncompliance. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:10 am
Didn't think there had to be "clear error. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:44 pm
You enter the information from the boxes on your form W-2 on your tax return. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:33 pm
The facts aren’t unusual. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
And we need to see this, because when you’re in the act of wanting something badly enough, there isn’t room for self-consciousness. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
Linda Greenhouse asks, "[W]hat, exactly, are people supposed to be afraid of now? [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:39 am
The court didn’t need to decide when pregnancy begins “as a biological matter. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:42 am
Plavac, W. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm
But we didn't kill the Golem. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:46 am
Doesn’t that give you some comfort? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
At times, the judiciary’s resistance to delving into the factual underpinnings of expert witness opinions is extraordinary. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
UK = no right of publicity, so only way to protect Rihanna against sale of T-shirts w/her image is to use passing off, which requires confusion. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 10:01 pm
District Court Judge W. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
We’re not asking testable questions; we assume in the law a kind of decisionmaking that cognitive scientists don’t agree w/ in their model of consumer decisionmaking: conscious and unconscious elements of choice that vary across circumstances. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Normally when we talk about consumer protection we’re concerned w/ a particular category of consumers regarded as vulnerable: lack the same level of info as businesses in the marketplace. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
The question isn't whether "heart" counts. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Is that then res judicata with respect to the other? [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
The petitioner in Carlton at least got the traditional consolation prize – a separate opinion explaining the error by the court below; although Justice Sotomayor (joined by Justice Breyer) wasn’t moved to dissent, she filed an opinion “respecting the denial of certiorari” explaining the error in the Fifth Circuit’s application of plain error. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
“[T]hey are unreliable in the service loads they are under now. [read post]
